Timeline

Tools

Client

My Role

I work as a solo Product designer. My responsibility includes:

  • User Research: User Interview, Affinity Mapping, User Journey Map

  • UX UI Design: Wireframe, Hi-Fi Interface Design

  • Testing: A/B Testing, Value Proposition Testing

  • Design System: Components Library

Stakeholder

Project Type

5 weeks. Jan 2024 - Feb 2024.

Figma, Google Forms, Excel, Procreate.

Product Owner and users including school headmaster, teachers, as well as students.

Passion Project

Problem

Redesign Goals

Results

P. I Art school is an art education institution. When I was a student here, many of my classmates has revealed school system was clunky, sometimes they had a hard time dealing with it.

Make school system efficient and intuitive for students to fulfill everyday routine tasks. Increase engagement and satisfaction rate.

1. Improve the visual hierarchy, attune to user habits.
2. Reprioritize the modules in landing page, add shortcuts to frequently used functions.
3. Streamline the user journey for students to upload assignments.
4. Attune the interaction to specific user case.

The redesigned website features a clean, clutter-free interface, making it easier for users to navigate and access essential features.

29%

Increase in average task completion rate

67%

Improved in finding assignment process

95%

User satisfaction rate

CONTEXT

The Old Design

“It feels like a 90s website.”

More than few times I heard my classmates complain about the school system. Besides the retro look, it was often clunky when students/teachers complete their essential tasks.

USER RESEARCH

Knowing users’ goals helps me define the redesign direction.

Step1 - I ask questions regarding the specific frustrations, and what’s the expectation.

I structure the interview questions on Google Forms, then ask 6 students, induce them to discuss any frustration and goal into detail.

Step 2 - Affinity map organize research insights.

I use affinity mapping to categorize the findings, the themes are fallen into 3 main baskets: user experience with school system, students’ goals as well as students’ lifestyle.

DEFINE

User Research Insights

1.Students are upset with the long-winded and error-trigging user journey.

Satisfaction slumped significantly after “go to class” activity, where students usually spend extra time figuring submitting assignments to the right class week.

Current user journey & pain points

2. Students have busy lifestyle, prioritize system efficiency more than social functions.

Many students tend to be goal-oriented, like prepare portfolios and improve skills, instead of experience or socialize. This helps me prioritize audit findings, my redesign will focus more on improving efficient use rather than social functions.

Prioritizing design requirements

IDEATE

Agile Design Process

PROBLEM 1

Frequently used modules are hidden on landing page.

Class and assignment modules are hidden in landing page while irrelevant information takes prominent screen real estate.

Landing Page, before

IDEATE

A shortcut to class should be incorporated.

I brainstorm the layout and modules for landing page. Since “go to class“ is a main task, I pay extra attention to the class module design.

Design Pattern sketches

DECISION TO BE MADE


🖼 Horizontal carousel, or 📆 calendar View?

There’re 2 forms of class module come into my brain: first is an image carousel, and second is a calendar view. They both have pros and cons.

Course module, Image carousel 

✅ Images help distinguish classes

✅ Large touch area

❌ Doesn’t provide schedule tracking

A/B TESTING

RATIONALE

VARIATION COMPARISON

❌ Background contrast issue (according to WebAIM.org)

Course module, Calendar view

✅ Track class schedules, enable week and month switch

❌ Small touch area 

❌ More information provided once, increase cognitive load

Testing uncovers which variation mostly suits the use case.

To find out which variation mostly fits specific use case, I conduct A/B testing with 5 participants. I record their votes, write down their feedbacks. It helps me make the decision.

Online testing via Google Meet & in-person testing

I choose carousel variation based on the following testing insight:

Course carousel is more suitable for this use case, because it has larger touch area. Besides, the images help recognize different classes.

Whereas for calendar view, the texts are too small, students don’t have tons of schedules to track, either.

Optimize accessibility. Fine tune the information display.

Then I move on to tweak the carousel display, where in style 1 I tried a dark overlay but later I realize there is potential contrast issue according to WebAIM, so I adopted style 2, variation 6, which resolve the contrast issue, also gives more information about teacher and time. 

Carousel style 1, Variation 1,2,3

Carousel style 2, Variation 4,5,6

✅ Resolve contrast and focus issue

✅ give essential info regarding teacher’s name and class time

PROBLEM 2

Another challenge comes up:

It takes too many steps to find the right assignment card.

Another challenge is the assignment card. the previous design doesn’t display information in a direct and concise way, make students unfold every title to check if it is the right week to upload assignment. In my redesign, I add necessary indications for students to recognize the right one at first glance.

Assignment card, before redesign

❌ Titles lack date, unfold to check more info

❌ Latest class at bottom, sequence from old to new

❌ Upload button is small and hidden

Assignment card, after redesign

✅ Title includes week, date, short content, and status 

✅ Latest assignment on top, sequence from new to old

✅ Big CTA button for “Upload” 

PROBLEM 3

In fact, Students submit pictures a lot more than texts.

but wait… text box takes up majority of the screen?

Students’ primary use case is submitting one or multiple images to get attendance check. However, they scarcely use the text box. To match the real use case, I change the proportion, enlarged the image box and shrink the text box.

Page proportion, before redesign

❌ Image upload button is basic, not indicative for batch

❌ Text box is underutilized, but takes prominent space

ILLUSTRATION DESIGN

Page proportion, after redesign

✅ Image upload button changes into a versatile box, indicative for batch

✅ Text box shrinks, leaving space for image upload

A bit humor motivates students to complete the task.

Due to peak-end ux law, I drew the illustrations in order to motivates students to complete the task, as well as a success illustration to paise users fulfill tasks. 

Motivating & rewarding illustrations

Final Design

Evaluation process

Be specific, be accurate

To remove the possible bias, I recruited 6 participants who didn’t use the school system before. The process goes like following: I used a spread sheet to record if participants successfully go through, or fail at certain task. One for existing school system, and the other for my redesign.

Task completion rate, before redesign

Success Result

Task completion rate, after redesign

Next Step

1. Test with different user group, like current students. Adopt other metric to measure.

2. Figure out why task completion rate doesn’t improve much on assignment page. More iteration if needed.

I want to conduct more user testing. Especially, I especially want to try test with students, I believe their feedback will be very insightful. If test with them, since they already know how to use the system, I might adopt another metric, maybe like the time they spend on each task, to evaluate the redesign.

I also want to iterate the assignment page more, because I found the completion rate did not improve much in this specific task, I want to learn more about user feedback, maybe the new design pattern is relatively new and requires a learning curve, or it’s not so intuitive, or need further improvement.  

Previous
Previous

CRM Design

Next
Next

Reshine Community